КАК ВЫГЛЯДИТ АПОФАТИЧЕСКОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ АКТИВНОСТИ? УЧИМСЯ РАССМАТРИВАТЬ ДЕЛИКАТНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ТИШИНЫ И УДИВЛЕНИЯ В ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОЙ ПРАКТИКЕ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-3-52-65Ключевые слова:
созерцательное удивление, apophatic philosophy, existential phenomenology, contemplative wonderАннотация
Вдохновленная «апофатическим поворотом» в теологии, философии и искусстве, а также экзистенциальной феноменологией, статья призывает нас смотреть на себя со стороны подобно актерам, чтобы позволить жизни или самому явлению воздействовать на нас. Этот тип апофатического мышления созвучен идеям норвежского философа Олафа Эйкеланда, когда он описывает «инсайдерское и практическое исследование активности». Апофатические возможности такого способа понимания исследования активности раскрываются в статье путем указания на три измерения: Знания, Бытия и Тайны, а также на четыре способа видения активности изнутри не только как «гносеологии», но и как «а-гносеологии». Последнее достигается глубоким чувством удивления, за которым следует то, что даосы называют У-Вэй, или «действие без усилий».Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Benjamin W. (1968). The task of the translator. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (pp. 69—82). Schocken [in Eng].
Benjamin W. (2002). One-way street. In M. Bullock & M. Jennings (Eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Vol 1 (1913—1926). Harvard University Press [in Eng].
Braver L. (2014). Groundless grounds: A study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger. The MIT Press [in Eng].
Capobianco R. (2011). Engaging Heidegger. University of Toronto Press [in Eng].
Capobianco R. (2015). Heidegger’s Way of Being. University of Toronto Press [in Eng].
Conty A. (2013). They have eyes that they might not see: Walter Benjamin’s aura and the optical unconscious. Literature & Theology, 27(4), 472—486 [in Eng].
Cooper D. (2002). The Measure of things: Humanism, humility, and mystery. Clarendon Press [in Eng].
Cooper D. (2018). Senses of mystery: Engaging with nature and the meaning of life. Routledge [in Eng].
Dinkins C.S., Hansen F.T. (2016). Socratic wonder as a way to aletheia in qualitative research and action research. Haser. Revista International de Filosofia Aplicada, 7, 51—88 [in Eng].
Dreyfus H., Dreyfus H. (1988). Mind over Machine. Simon & Schuster [in Eng].
Dreyfus H. (2004). What could be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility? Reinterpreting division I of being and time in light of division II. Bulleting of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 265-274 [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2001). Action research as the hidden curriculum of the western tradition. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research—Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 145-155). Sage Publication [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2006a). Phronesis, Aristotle, and action research. International Journal of Action Research, 2(1), 5-53 [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2006b). Condescending ethics and action research: Extended review article. Action Research, 4(1), 37-47 [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2007). From epistemology to gnoseology: understanding the knowledge claims of action research. Management Research News, 30(5), 344-358 [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle-Aristotelian phronêsis, Aristotelian philosophy of dialogue, and action research. Peter Lang Publishers [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2012). Action research: applied research, intervention research, collaborative research, practitioner research, or praxis research? International Journal of Action Research, 8(1), 9-44 [in Eng].
Eikeland O. (2015). Praxis: retrieving the roots of action research. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research 3rd Edition (pp. 381-391). SAGE Production [in Eng].
Fiumara G.C. (2006). The other side of language: A philosophy of listening. Routledge [in Eng].
Flavel S., Luzar R. (2019). Drawing the Dao: Reflections on the application of Daoist theory of action in contemporary drawing practice. Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice, 4(2), 11-27 [in Eng].
Franke W. (2007a). On what cannot be said: Apophatic discourses in philosophy, religion, literature, and the arts. (Vol.1: Classic formulations). University of Notre Dame Press [in Eng].
Franke W. (2007b). On what cannot be said: Apophatic discourses in philosophy, religion, literature, and the arts. (Vol. 2: Modern and contemporary transformations). University of Notre Dame Press [in Eng].
Franke W. (2014). A philosophy of the unsayable. University of Notre Dame Press [in Eng].
Franke W. (2020). On the universality of what is not: The apophatic turn in critical thinking. University of Notre Dame Press [in Eng].
Gadamer H. G. (1998). Praise of theory. Yale University Press [in Eng].
Gadamer H.G. (2006/1960). Truth and method. Continuum [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2014). Kan man undre sig uden ord? Design- og universitetspædagogik på creative videregående uddannelser. [Can
We Wonder Without Words? Design and University Pedagogy in Creative Higher Education]. Aalborg University Press [in Eng].
Hansen F.T., Jørgensen L.B. (2021). Wonder-inspired leadership: Or how to cultivate ethical and phenomenon-led health care. Nursing Ethics, 28(6), 951-966 [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2008). Phronesis and Eros: the existential dimension of phronesis and clinical supervision og nurses. In C. Delmar & C. Johns (Eds.), The Good, the Wise and the Right Clinical Nursing Practice (pp. 27-58). Aalborg University Hospital Press [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2015a). The call and practice of wonder: How to evoke a Socratic community of wonder in professional settings. In M. Noah Weiss (Ed.), Socratic Handbook: Dialogue Methods for Philosophical Practice
(pp. 217—244). LIT Verlag [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2015b). The philosophical practitioner as a co-researcher. In A. Fatic & L. Amir (Eds.), Practicing Philosophy (pp. 22—41). Cambridge Scholar Publishing [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2016a). At undre sig ved livets afslutning: Om brug af filosofiske samtaler i palliativt arbejde. Akademisk forlag [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2016b). Fra den lærerende organisation til den undrende organisation: Praxis-ontologiske refleksioner over etik, undren og ’organizational wisdom’. In K.D. Keller (Ed.), Organisatorisk dannelse: Etiske perspektiver på organisatorisk læring (pp. 237-274). Aalborg Universitetsforlag [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2017). Sokratisk og fænomenologisk-orienteret aktionsforskning. In H. Alrø & F.T. Hansen (Eds.), Dialogisk aktionsforskning i et praksisnært perspektiv (pp. 93-144). Aalborg Universitetsforlag [in Eng].
Hansen F.T. (2018). At møde verden med undren: Dannelse, innovation og organisatorisk udvikling i et værensfilosofisk perspektiv. Hans Reitzel [in Eng].
Heidegger M. (1995/1927). Being and time. Basil Blackwell [in Eng].
Heidegger M. (2004/1954). What is called thinking? HarperCollins Publishers [in Eng].
Heidegger M. (2009/1924). Basic concept of Aristotelian philosophy. Indiana University Press [in Eng].
Herholdt-Lomholdt S.M. (2017). Sensitive Go-alongs: aktionsforskning udenfor det synliges grænse. In H. Alrø & F.T. Hansen (Eds.), Dialogisk
aktionsforskning i et praksisnært perspektiv (pp. 145-176). Aalborg Universitetsforlag [in Eng].
Kierkegaard S. (1989/1841). The concept of irony with continual reference to Socrates. Princeton University Press [in Eng].
Kierkegaard S. (2018/1849). The lily of the field and the bird of the air. Princeton University Press [in Eng].
Klee P. (1969). The thinking eye (Paul Klee’s notebooks, vol. 1). Percy Lund, Humphries & Co [in Eng].
Kline P. (2017). Passion for nothing: Kierkegaard’s apophatic theology. Fortress Press [in Eng].
Kukla A. (2005). Ineffability and philosophy. Routledge [in Eng].
Lesure J. (1956). Lapicque. Galanis [in Eng].
May R. (1989). Heidegger’s hidden sources: East Asian Influences on is work. Routledge [in Eng].
Mjaaland M.T. (2021). Ecophilosophy and the ambivalence of nature: Kierkegaard and Knausgård on lilies, birds and being. Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook, 26(1), 325-350 [in Eng].
Rhodes M.C. (2014). Mystery in philosophy: An invocation of pseudo-dionysius. Lexington Books [in Eng].
Rosa H. (2019). Resonance: a sociology of our relationship to the world. Polity Press [in Eng].
Rosa H. (2020). The uncontrollability of the world. Polity Press [in Eng].
Rubenstein M.J. (2011). Strange wonder: The closure of metaphysics and the opening of awe. Columbia University Press [in Eng].
Schinkel A. (2021). Wonder and education: On the educational importance of contemplative wonder [in Eng].
Schön D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books [in Eng].
Tan C. (2020). Revisiting Donald Schön’s notion of reflective practice: A Daoist interpretation. Reflective Practice, 21(5), 686-698 [in Eng].
Topsøe-Jensen S. (2021, October 28). Wonder: A seminar October 2021 [Seminar]. Aalborg, Denmark, available at: https://art-oflistening.org/wonder/ [in Eng].
Visse M., Hansen F.T., Leget C. (2019). The unsayable in arts-based research: on the praxis of life itself. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-13 [in Eng].
