CULTURAL GAP: TO THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING THE PHENOMENON/ AND ITS MAIN FEATURES

Authors

  • Andrey N. Minchenko Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture and Arts, Postgraduate student of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies (Chelyabinsk, Russia) Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-1-100-108

Keywords:

культурные основания, cultural differences cultural contradictions, cultural diversity, cultural grounds

Abstract

Introduction. The article analyzes one of the qualitative states of culture, called the cultural gap, which is a phenomenon of ambivalent properties, on the one hand, generating most of the destructive conflicts in the history of mankind, and on the other hand, in constructive overcoming of contradictions, prompting creative transformations. The purpose of the study is to give a definition of a cultural gap with the allocation of significant distinctive features found when analyzing any empirically fixed manifestations of it, for subsequent understanding at the ultimate general level of reflection. Methods. Philosophical-anthropological, systemic, axiological, historical-philosophical and dialectical approaches are used as the methodological basis of the research, making it possible to consider the phenomenon of cultural gap in various aspects. Scientific novelty of the research. An analysis of the main directions of scientific discourse in the subject area under consideration makes it possible for us to conclude that the phenomenon of a cultural gap is studied within the framework of social and humanitarian knowledge, but mainly in relation to the analysis of conflict situations and turning points in history. The phrase “cultural gap” itself is beginning to be introduced into scientific circulation, however, often outside the established conceptual apparatus, in a narrow context and without meaningful disclosure, which makes it scientifically necessary to address the emerging subject field of studying the phenomenon and determining the meaning of the corresponding term. Results. As a result of the study, the author identifies significant signs of the phenomenon of a cultural gap, consisting in the loss of the integrity of certain areas of culture due to the heterogeneous development of its parts, a critically significant interruption at the level of structure and content of the universals of culture in the deep value and semantic relationships provided by it, supporting mutual understanding and conflict-free coexistence of people. As no less significant signs, one can also designate the polarization and absolutization of cultural contradictions that result in antagonistic relations between representatives of sociocultural communities, separated by the interruption of these relationships Conclusions. The definition of a cultural gap, formed on the basis of existing options for interpreting and comprehending this phenomenon, its essential and contextual features, is due to the ontological and semantic ambiguity of some of its aspects, due to which it goes beyond a strict definition and is partly projective in nature, containing significant research potential. The realization of this potential through the functional capabilities of philosophical anthropology and philosophy of culture will make it possible to determine the main approaches to identifying, preventing and overcoming cultural gaps, including the formation of new worldview meanings and values that can ensure harmonious coexistence between people of different cultures in modern conditions.
Received: 23 January 2023

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Грицков, Ю. В. Феномен страдания в ситуации культурно-исторического разрыва / Ю. В. Грицков // Российский человек в «разломе эпох»: quo vadis? / Материалы XV Международной научно-практической конференции Гуманитарного университета. — 2012. — С. 175—179.

2. Запесоцкий, А. С. Теория культуры академика В. С. Степина: лекции, прочитанные студентам СПбГУП в мае—сентябре 2010 года / А. С. Запесоцкий. — СПб. : СПбГУП, 2010. — 112 с.

3. Ионин, Л. Г. Социология культуры / Л. Г. Ионин. — М. : Изд. дом ГУ ВШЭ, 2004. — 427 с.

4. Кикель, П. В. Краткий энциклопедический словарь философских терминов / П. В. Кикель, Э. М. Сороко. 2-е изд. — Минск : БГПУ,

2008. — 266 с.

5. Малахов, В. С. Идентичность / В. С. Малахов // Новая философская энциклопедия. В.С. Степин (ред.). — М. : Мысль, 2000—2001.

6. Меняева, М. П. Культура согласия — стабилизационный и инновационный потенциал современной культуры М. П. Меняева // Ценности и смыслы. — 2014. — №5 (33). — С. 125—133.

7. Минченко, А. Н. Феномен культурного разрыва: формирование проблематики в социально-гуманитарном познании и основания философского осмысления А. Н. Минченко // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. — 2022. — № 2 (460). Философские науки. Вып. 63. — С. 66—74. doi: 10.47475/1994-2796-2022-10209.

8. Никифоров, А. Л. Часть и целое / А. Л. Никифоров // Новая философская энциклопедия. — М. : Мысль, 2000—2001.

9. Ожегов, С. И. Толковый словарь русского языка / С. И. Ожегов, Н. Ю. Шведова. Российская академия наук. Институт русского языка имени

В. В. Виноградова. 4-е изд., доп. — М. : Азбуковник, 1997. — 944 с.

10. Пивоваров, Д. В. Часть и целое / Д. В. Пивоваров // Современный философский словарь. —М., 1998. — 1060 с.

11. Степин, В. С. Конструктивные и прогностические функции философии / В. С. Степин // Вопросы философии. — 2009. — № 1. — С. 5—10.

12. Степин, В. С. Философия и универсалии культуры / В. С. Степин. СПб., 2000. 20 c.

13. Степин, В. С. Философский анализ универсалий культуры / В. С. Степин // Гуманитарные науки. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 8—15.

14. Степин, В. С. Цивилизация и культура / В. С. Степин. СПб. : СПбГУП, 2011. 408 с.

15. Яхьяева, А. Х. Культурная травма в этногенезе народа / А. Х. Яхьяева // Актуальные направления научных исследований: перспективы развития : сб. материалов VI Междунар. науч.-практ.

конф. — 2018. — С. 37—38.

16. Sunstein, Cass R. Going to extremes: how like minds unite and divide / Cass R. Sunstein. Oxford : Oxford University Press, Inc. 2009. — 387 p.

17. Cultural divides: understanding and overcoming group conflict. — New York : Russell Sage Foundation. 2001. — 508 p.

18. Desmet, K. The Cultural Divide / K. Desmet, R. Wacziarg // NBER Working Paper. — 2018. — No. 24630. May. — 53 p.

19. Ferrada-Noli, M. A cross-cultural breakdown of Swedish suicide / M. Ferrada-Noli // Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. — 1997. — Vol. 96, iss. 2. — Pp. 108-116.

20. Fox, R. Editorial: The Breakdown of Culture / R. Fox. — URL: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/ ca.36.1.2744219 (accessed 01 October 2021).

21. Toffler, A. Future Shock / A. Toffler. — Moscow : AST, 2002.

1. Grickov Ju. V. (2012) Rossiĭskiĭ chelovek v «razlome jepoh»: quo vadis? [The Russian Man in “the Fault of the Age”: quo vadis?]. Materialy XV

Mezhdunarodnoĭ nauchno-prakticheskoĭ konferencii Gumanitarnogo universiteta. Pp. 175—179 [in Rus].

2. Zapesockiĭ A. S. (2010) Teorija kul’tury akademika V. S. Stepina: lekcii, prochitannye studentam SPbGUP v mae—sentjabre 2010 goda [Theory of culture academician V. S. Stepin: lectures given to students of SPbSUp in May-September 2010]. Saint Petersburg, SPbGUP, 112 p. [in Rus].

3. Ionin L. G. (2004) Sociologija kul’tury [The sociology of culture]. Moscow, Izd. dom GU VShJe, 427 p. [in Rus].

4. Kikel’ P. V., Soroko Je. M. (2008) Kratkij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ filosofskih terminov [Brief encyclopedic dictionary of philosophical terms]. 2-e izd. Minsk, BGPU, 266 p. [in Rus].

5. Malahov V. S. (2000—2001) Identichnost’ [The Identity]. Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija. V.S. Stepin. (red.). Moscow, Mysl’ [in Rus].

6. Menjaeva M. P. (2014) Kul’tura soglasija — stabilizacionnyj i innovacionnyj potencial sovremennoj kul’tury [Culture of harmony — stabilization and innovation potential of modern culture]. Cennosti i

smysly, no.5 (33), pp. 125 — 133 [in Rus].

7. Minchenko A. N. (2022) Fenomen kul’turnogo razryva: formirovanie problematiki v social’nogumanitarnom poznanii i osnovanija filosofskogo

osmyslenija [The phenomenon of cultural divide: problem-setting in social and human knowledge and foundations of philosophical understanding].

Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No 2 (460). Filosofskie nauki. Vyp. 63, pp. 66—74, doi: 10.47475/1994- 2796-2022-10209 [in Rus].

8. Nikiforov A.L. (2000—2001) Chast’ i celoe [The part and the whole]. Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija. V.S. Stepin (red.). Moscow, Mysl’ [in Rus].

9. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Ju. (1997) Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Language Dictionary]. Rossijskaja akademija nauk. Institut

russkogo jazyka imeni V. V. Vinogradova. 4-e izd., dop. Moscow, Azbukovnik, 944 p. [in Rus].

10. Pivovarov D. V. (1998) Chast’ i celoe [The part and the whole]. Sovremennyj filosofskij slovar’. Kemerov V.E. (red.), 1060 p. [in Rus].

11. Stepin V. S. (2009) Konstruktivnye i prognosticheskie funkcii filosofii [Constructive and Predictive Functions of Philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 1, pp. 5—10 [in Rus].

12. Stepin V. S. (2000) Filosofija i universalii kul’tury [Philosophy and the universals of culture]. Saint Petersburg, 20 p. [in Rus].

13. Stepin V. S. (2011) Filosofskij analiz universalij kul’tury [Philosophical analysis of the universals of culture]. Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 1, pp. 8—15 [in Rus].

14. Stepin V. S. (2011) Civilizacija i kul’tura [Civilization and culture]. Saint Petersburg, SPbGUP, 408 p. [in Rus].

15. Jah’jaeva A. H. (2018) Kul’turnaja travma v jetnogeneze naroda [The cultural trauma at ethnogenesis of people]. Aktual’nye napravlenija

nauchnyh issledovaniĭ: perspektivy razvitija. Sb. materialov VI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Pp. 37— 38 [in Rus].

16. Sunstein Cass R. (2009) Going to extremes: how like minds unite and divide. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Inc. 387 p. [in Eng].

17. Cultural divides: understanding and overcoming group conflict (2001). New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 508 p. [in Eng].

18. Desmet K., Wacziarg R. (2018) The Cultural Divide. NBER Working Paper, no. 24630, May, 53 p. [in Eng].

19. Ferrada-Noli M. (1997) A cross-cultural breakdown of Swedish suicide. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 96, iss. 2, pp. 108—116 [in Eng].

20. Fox R. Editorial: The Breakdown of Culture. available at: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/ ca.36.1.2744219 (accessed 01 October 2021) [in Eng].

21. Toffler A. (2002) Future Shock. Moscow, AST [in Rus].

Downloads

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Section

Статьи

How to Cite

Minchenko A.N. CULTURAL GAP: TO THE PROBLEM OF DEFINING THE PHENOMENON/ AND ITS MAIN FEATURES // Социум и власть. 2023. Vol. 95, no. 1. P. 100–108. https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-1-100-108