POLITICAL AND LEGAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS: TRANSHUMANISTIC PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-1-51-60Keywords:
трансгуманизм, innovationism, high technologies, artificial intelligence, social sphere, politics and law, transhumanismAbstract
Introduction. Innovationism in various areas of society has changed both the natural and social environment. The change speed in the new information and communication field is the reason for many questions related to studying the problems of society and the machine, finding out the place of artificial intelligence in social relations. These processes stimulated the philosophical research, the subject of which was man, modern technologies, scenarios for the development of society, sociocultural and political-legal forms of its organization. Since the 90s of the twentieth century in the West and later in Russia, a transhumanistic concept has been formed, which connects man, society and technology in a special way. Representatives of transhumanism study the technical developments of human immortality and build models of the perfect man, pursuing as a goal, his deliverance from suffering and disease. Transhumanistic perspectives actualize the need for a thorough, constructive and critical assessment of the possible advantages and risks of technological development, and its impact on the political and legal structure. In this regard, the ability to see and isolate the features of this process and subsequent reflection is fundamentally important. The purpose of the article is to consider political and legal transformations in the context of the interaction of modern technologies and society through the prism of transhumanistic perspectives, to identify possible directions of philosophical reflection of political and legal modes of modernity. Methods. To achieve the research goal, general scientific methods of cognition were used: analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, abstraction. The article also applied institutionalfunctional and system-structural approaches, the method of interpretation and content analysis. The analysis of public opinion and special labeling of artificial intelligence was carried out with the help of appealing to network content (social networks, blogs, and forums). Communication channels reproduce messages mentioning modern technologies from the point of view of the philistine worldview based on stereotypes broadcast in society and the influence of popular culture. Content analysis revealed the relevance of the spectrum of labeling, relative to artificial intelligence systems, including the verbs “create”, “destroy”, “help”, “enslave”. Regarding the sphere of labor, law and politics, the positions differ, from outright alarmism to utopian images of social well-being. Scientific novelty of the study. The article analyzes the prospects of considering the phenomenon of social transformations, the forms of their representation through political and legal views as exemplified by transhumanism. Results. The author attempts to give a comprehensive description of social changes in the field of public administration, legal regulation, legal personality and legal responsibility, social equality of participants in legal relations through the specific refraction of these social phenomena in transhumanistic ideas. The spectrum of the main problems in the sphere of interests of the transhumanistic worldview is listed. Conclusion. Turning to modernization strategies on the example of transhumanism is a natural and necessary need in the political and legal sphere, in particular. In the course of the analysis, a wide range of problems were identified that actualize the social and axiological and anthropological optics of the research. Diverse forms of transhumanistic political trends act as manifestations of socio-legal reflection on the intensification of innovationism, which is capable of radically changing human nature.Downloads
References
1. Баранов, П. П. Правовое регулирование робототехники и искусственного интеллекта в России: некоторые подходы к
решению проблемы / П. П. Баранов // Северо-Кавказский юридический вестник. — 2018. — № 1. — С. 39—45.
2. Введение в трансгуманизм // Сайт Российского Трансгуманистического Движения. — URL: http://transhuman.ru/biblioteka/
vvodnyematerialy/vvedenie-v-transgumanizm (дата обращения: 02.11.2022).
3. Голубцов, В. Г. Российская Федерация как субъект гражданского права / В. Г. Голубцов. — М. : Статут, 2021.
4. Гришин, Д. Закон об робототехнике / Д. Гришин. — URL: https://www.dentons.com/ru/insights/ alerts/2017/january/27/ (дата обращения: 03.06.2022).
5. Купер, Р. Д. Седьмое чувство. Под знаком предсказуемости: как прогнозировать и управлять изменениями в цифровую эпоху / Р. Д. Купер [Пер. с англ. Э. Ибрагимовой, А. Рудницкой]. — М. : Эскимо, 2017.
6. Кельзен, Г. Чистое учение о праве / Г. Кельзен. — СПб. : Алеф-Пресс, 2015. — С. 212-219.
7. Маслов, В. Н. Высокие технологии и феномен постчеловеческого в современном обществе / В. Н. Маслов : дис. … д-ра филос. наук. — Н. Новгород, 2014.
8. Определение трансгуманизма // Сайт Российского Трансгуманистического Движения. — URL: http://transhumanism-russia.
ru/content/view/555/110/ (дата обращения: 02.11.2022).
9. Пилипенко, А. Н. Тенденции цифровизации исполнительной власти в зарубежных странах / А. Н. Пилипенко. — М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2021.
10. Погрефность // Российская газета. 2017, 25 июля. — URL: https://rg.ru/gazeta/2017/07/25.html (дата обращения: 02.06.2022).
11. Правовое регулирование цифровой экономики в современных условиях развития высокотехнологического бизнеса в национальном и глобальном контексте: коллективная монография / Под. общ. ред.
В. Н. Синюкова, М. А. Егоровой. — М. : Проспект, 2021.
12. Рыбаков, О. Ю. Трансгуманизм Макса Мора: автаркия и отчуждение / О. Ю. Рыбаков, С. В. Тихонова // Философия права. —
2013. — № 3. — С. 56-60.
13. Субботина, Н. Д. Феномен гуманности и идея гуманизма / Н. Д. Субботина. — Чита : ЗабГУ, 2018.
14. Талапина, Э. В. Право и цифровизация: новые вызовы и перспективы / Э. В. Талапина // Журнал российского права. — 2018. — № 2. — С. 9.
15. Bailey, R. Trans-Human Expressway: Why libertarians will win the future / R. Bailey. — URL: http://reason.com/archives/2005/05/11/transhuman-expressway
(дата обращения: 01.11.2022).
16. Bostrom, N. Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges / N. Bostrom, A. Sandberg // Science and Engineering Ethics. — 2009. — Vol. 15(3). — Pp. 311—341.
17. Carrico, D. Condensed Critique of Transhumanism / D. Carrico // Amor Mundi. 2009. — URL: https://amormundi.blogspot.
com/2009/01/condensedcritique-of transhumanism.html (дата обращения: 14.10.2022).
18. Carrico, D. Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia / D. Carrico // The Technoprogressive. 2006. — URL: http://technoprogressive.blogspot.com/2006/08/technoprogressivism-beyond.html (дата обращения: 02.11.2022).
19. Cerka, P. Liability for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence / P. Cerka, J. Grigiene, G. Sirbikyte // Computer Law & Security Review. — Vol. 31. — Iss. 3. — P. 383.
20. Hughes, J. Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future / J. Hughes. — Cambridge, MA : Westview Press, 2004.
21. More, M. The Extropian Principles / M. More // Extropy. — 1992. — Vol. 4. — Iss. 1. — Pр. 5—8.
22. Morhat, P. M. On the issue of legal personality of an «electronic person» / P. M. Morhat // Legal Studies. — 2018. — № (4). Pр. 1—8. — URL: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2018.4.25647 (дата обращения:
03.06.2022).
23. Reynolds, G. An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths / G. Reynolds. — Nashville : Thomas Nelson, Inc. 2006.
24. Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw // California Law Review. — 2015. — № 103(3). — Pр. 513—563.
25. Solaiman, S. M. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy / S. M. Solaiman // Artificial
Intelligence and Law. — 2017. — Vol. 25. — Iss. 2. — Pр. 155—179.
26. Solum, L. B. Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences / L. B. Solum // North Carolina Law Review. — 1992. — № 7 (4). — Pр. 1231—1287.
1. Baranov P.P (2018) Severo-Kavrazskii jridicheskii vestnik, no. 1, pp. 39-45 [in Rus].
2. Vvedenie v transgymanizm [Introduction to Transhumanism], available at: http://transhuman.ru/biblioteka/vvodnyematerialy/vvedenie-v-transgumanizm (accessed 02.11.2022) [in Rus].
3. Golubtsov V. G. (2021) Rosiiskaya Federatsiya kak sub’ekt grazhdanskogo prava. [The Russian Federation as a subject of civil law].
Мoscow, Statut [in Rus].
4. Grishin D. Zakon o robototechnike [The Law on Robotics], available at: https://www.dentons.com/ru/insights/alerts/2017/january/27/) (accessed 03.06.2022) [in Rus].
5. Kuper R. D. (2017) Sed’moe cyuvstvo. Pod znakom predskazuemosti: kak prognozirovat’ i upravlyat’ izmeneniyami v tsifrovuyu epohy [The seventh sense. Under the sign of predictability: how to predict and manage changes in the digital age]. Мoscow, Eskimo [in Rus].
6. Kel’zen G. (2015) Chistoe uchenie o prave [Pure doctrine of law]. Saint Petersburg, AlefPressб pp. 212-219 [in Rus].
7. Maslov V. M. (2014) Visokie technologii i fenomen postchelovecheskogo v sovremennom obzhyestve. [High technologies and the phenomenon of the posthuman in modern society]. N. Novgorod, p. 9 [in Rus].
8. Optdelenie transgumanizma [Definition of Transhumanism], available at: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/555/110/
(accessed 02.11.2022) [in Rus].
9. Pilipenko A. N. (2021) Tendentsii tsifrovizatsii ispolnitelnoi vlasti v zarubezhnich stranach [Trends in digitalization of executive power in foreign countries]. Мoscow, Infotropic Media [in Rus].
10. Pogrefnost’ [Pogrefnost] (2017). Rossiiskaya gazeta, available at: https://rg.ru/ gazeta/2017/07/25.html (accessed 02.06.2022) [in Rus].
11. Pravovoe regulirovanie tsifrovoi economiki v sovremennich usloviyah razvitiya visokotechnologicheskogo biznesa v natsionalnov i globalnom contekste (2021) [Legal regulation of the digital economy in modern conditions of high-tech business development in a national and global context]. Мoscow, Prospekt [in Rus].
12. Ribakov O. YU., Tichonova S. V. (2013) Filosophia prava, no. 3, pp. 56-60 [in Rus].
13. Subbotina N. D. (2018) Fenomen gumannosti i ideya gumanizma [The phenomenon of humanity and the idea of humanism]. Chita, ZabGU [in Rus].
14. Talapina E. V. (2018) Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, no. 2, p. 9 [in Rus].
15. Bailey R. Trans-Human Expressway: Why libertarians will win the future, available at: http://reason.com/archives/2005/05/11/transhuman-expressway (accessed 01.11.2022) [in Eng].
16. Bostrom N., Sandberg A. (2009) Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol.
15(3), pp. 311—341 [in Eng].
17. Carrico D. (2009) Condensed Critique of Transhumanism. Amor Mundi, available at: https://amormundi.blogspot.com/2009/01/
condensedcritique-of transhumanism.html (accessed 14.10.2022) [in Eng].
18. Carrico D. (2006) Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia. The Technoprogressive, available at: http://
technoprogressive.blogspot.com/ 2006/08/
technoprogressivism-beyond.html (accessed 02.11.2022) [in Eng].
19. Cerka P., Grigiene J., Sirbikyte, G. Liability for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review, 31, iss. 3,
р. 383 [in Eng].
20. Hughes J. (2004) Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press [in Eng].
21. More M. (1992) The Extropian Principles. Extropy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-8 [in Eng].
22. Morhat P. M. (2018) On the issue of legal personality of an «electronic person». Legal Studies, no. (4), р. 1-8, available at: https://doi.
org/10.25136/2409-7136.2018.4.25647 (accessed 03.06.2022) [in Eng].
23. Reynolds G. (2006) An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths. Nashville, Thomas Nelson, Inc. [in Eng].
24. Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw (2015). California Law Review, no. 103(3), рp. 513-563 [in Eng].
25. Solaiman S. M. (2017) Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 25, Iss. 2, pp. 155-179 [in Eng].
26. Solum L. B. (1992) Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, no. 7 (4), рp. 1231-1287 [in Eng].