TWO APPROACHES TO SOCIAL POLICY IN THE GERMAN CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE LATE XX CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-2-48-58Keywords:
Г. Рормозер, conservatism, history of Germany, G.-K. Kaltenbrunner, G. RohrmoserAbstract
Introduction. In conservative political philosophy in Germany at the end of the 20th century, there developed two main approaches to social policy. The first one, paternalistic and corporatist approach continued the line that had been established in the 19th century and assumed the active participation of the state in regulating social support. The second, the market one, adopted American ideas of the second half of the 20th century and proposed limiting the scope of the welfare state in order to save resources and avoid a negative impact on the labor market. The purpose of the study is to analyze the arguments of the two directions of German conservatism at the end of the 20th century, their philosophical origin and their significance for politics. Methods. The article is based on the comparative historical approach, analysis of institutions and legal documents, and the hermeneutic method for studying the political, administrative and ideological context of the development of German conservatism at the end of the 20th century. Scientific novelty of the research. The article focuses on the intellectual heritage of German theorists, while the main attention of domestic and foreign researchers of conservative political philosophy of the late 20th century was attracted by American and British authors. Results. The key arguments of the paternalistic approach to social issues include pointing out the responsibility of elites for the well-being of the population and a strong state as a means of compensating for inequality in society. The arguments of the market approach are based on the appeal to the ideas of civic virtue and the protection of property as key forces that ensure social peace and well-being. Conclusions. In practice, the approach that offered the preservation and expansion of the welfare state prevailed, and favorable economic conditions, as well as institutional and ideological inertia, contributed to implementing solutions within the framework of this paradigm. But the ideas of the market approach have not lost their relevance, since the burden on the welfare state increases due to the aging of the population.Downloads
References
Зимаков, А. В. Пенсионная система ФРГ: эволюция или революция? / А. В. Зимаков // Современная Европа. — 2016. — № 4 (70). — С. 94—103.
Ким, Ф. С. «Просвещённый консерватизм» Г.-К. Кальтенбруннера и „gesellschaft für ganzheitsforschung“ / Ф. С. Ким // Грамота. — 2017. — № 7(81). — С. 75—78.
Ким, Ф. С. Героический пессимизм просвещенного консерватора: Герд-Клаус Кальтенбруннер / Ф. С. Ким // Гуманитарные и социальные науки. — 2011. — № 4. — С. 43—52.
Левченко, М. В. Конрад Аденауэр и германский консерватизм 50-60 гг. XX века : дис. … канд. ист. наук / М. В. Левченко. — Казань : Казанский государственный университет, 2004. — 203 с.
Рормозер, Г. Кризис либерализма / Г. Рормозер. — Москва : Институт философии РАН, 1996. — 292 с.
Рормозер, Г., Френкин А. А. Новый консерватизм: вызов для России / Г. Рормозер, А. А. Френкин. — Москва : Институт философии РАН, 1996. — 237 с.
Современный консерватизм / К. С. Гаджиев, С. П. Перегудов, В. А. Скороходов и др. — М. : Наука, 1992. — 264 с.
Шамшурин, В. И. «Концепция Фрасимаха» и социально-политический опыт консерватизма / В. И. Шамшурин // Социологические исследования. — 1994. — № 5. — С. 103—110.
Штебер, М. «1968» как год консерваторов, или разделение мнений. Либеральный консерватизм и «новые правые» / М. Штебер // Исторические исследования. Журнал Исторического факультета МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова. — 2016. — № 5. — С. 194—207.
Эрхард, Л. Благосостояние для всех / Л. Эрхард. — Москва : Дело, 2001. — 332 с.
Companje, K. P. Two centuries of solidarity. German, Belgian and Dutch social health insurance 1770—2008 / K. P. Companje, R. H. M. Hendriks, K. F. E. Veraghtert, B. E. M. Widdershoven. — Amsterdam : Aksant, 2009. — 393 p.
Giubilei, F. The history of European conservative thought / F. Giubilei. — Washington : Regnery Gateway, 2019. — 256 p.
Kaltenbrunner, G. K. Der schwierige Konservatismus / G. K. Kaltenbrunner // Rekonstruktion des Konservatismus / Hrsg. G.K.
Kaltenbrunner. — Freiburg im Breisgau : Rombach, 1972. — S. 19—54.
Kaufmann, F. X. Variations of the Welfare State: Great Britain, Sweden, France and Germany between Capitalism and Socialism / F. X. Kaufmann. — Berlin : Springer, 2013. — 260 p.
Leo Strauss on Maimonides. The Complete Writings. Ed. by Green K. H. — Chicago : Chicago university press, 2003. — 654 p.
Schludi, M. The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Systems. A Comparison of Pension Politics in Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden / M. Schludi. — Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press, 2005. — 311 p.
Steber, M. The Guardians of Concepts. Political Languages of Conservatism in Britain and West Germany, 1945-1980 / M. Steber. —
New-York : Berghahn Books, 2023. — 553 p.
Stolleis, M. History of Social Law in Germany / M. Stolleis. — Berlin: Springer, 2013. — 264 p.
Suvanto, P. Conservatism from the French Revolution to the 1990s. / P. Suvanto / Transl. from Finnish by R. Fletcher. — Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 1997. — 224 p.
Woods, R. Germany’s New Right as Culture and Politics / R. Woods. — Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. — 193 p.
Zimakov A.V. (2016) Pensionnaya sistema FRG: evolyutsiya ili revolyutsiya? [FRG pension system: evolution or revolution]. Sovremennaya
Yevropa, no. 4 (70), pp. 94-103 [in Rus].
Kim F.S. (2017) «Prosveshchennyy konservatizm» G.-K. Kaltenbrunnera i „gesellschaft für ganzheitsforschung“ [“Enlightened conservatism” of G.-K. Kaltenbrunner and „gesellschaft für ganzheitsforschung“]. Gramota, no. 7(81), pp. 75-78 [in Rus].
Kim F.S. (2011) Geroicheskiy pessimizm prosveshchennogo konservatora: Gerd-Klaus Kaltenbrunner [Heroic pessimism of the enlightened conservative: Gerd-Klaus Kaltenbrunner]. Gumanitarnyye i sotsialnyye nauki, no. 4, pp. 43-52 [in Rus].
Levchenko M.V. (2004) Konrad Adenauer i germanskiy konservatizm 50-60 gg. XX veka [Konrad Adenauer and the German conservatism of the 50-60’s of the 20th century]. Thesis. Kazan, 203 p. [in Rus].
Rormozer G. (1996) Krizis liberalizma [Crisis of the liberalism]. Moscow, Institut filosofii RAN, 292 p. [in Rus].
Rormozer G., Frenkin A.A. (1996) Novyy konservatizm: vyzov dlya Rossii [New conservatism: a challenge for Russia]. Moscow, Institut filosofii RAN, 237 p. [in Rus].
Sovremennyy konservatizm [Contemporary conservatism] (1992) / K.S. Gadzhiyev, SP. Peregudov, V.A. Skorokhodov et al. Moscow, Nauka, 264 p. [in Rus].
Shamshurin V.I. (1994) «Kontseptsiya Frasimakha» i sotsialno-politicheskiy opyt konservatizma [“Thrasymachus concept” and social-political experience of conservatism]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, no. 5, pp. 103-110 [in Rus].
Shteber M. (2016) «1968» kak god konservatorov, ili razdeleniye mneniy. Liberalnyy konservatizm i «novyye pravyye» [“1968” as the year of the conservatives, or division of opinions. Liberal conservatism and the New Right] Istoricheskiye issledovaniya. Zhurnal Istoricheskogo fakulteta MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, no. 5, pp. 194-207 [in Rus].
Erkhard L. (2001) Blagosostoyaniye dlya vsekh [Welfare for all]. Moscow, Delo, 332 p. [in Rus].
Companje K.P., Hendriks R.H.M., Veraghtert K.F.E., Widdershoven B.E.M. (2009) Two centuries of solidarity. German, Belgian and Dutch social health insurance 1770-2008. Amsterdam, Aksant, 393 p. [in Eng].
Giubilei F. (2019) The history of European conservative thought. Washington, Regnery Gateway, 256 p. [in Eng].
Kaltenbrunner G.K. (1972) Der schwierige Konservatismus // Rekonstruktion des Konservatismus / Hrsg. G.K. Kaltenbrunner.
Freiburg im Breisgau, Rombach, S. 19-54 [in Ger].
Kaufmann F.X. (2013) Variations of the Welfare State: Great Britain, Sweden, France and Germany between Capitalism and Socialism. Berlin, Springer, 260 p. [in Eng].
Leo Strauss on Maimonides (2003) The Complete Writings. Ed. by Green K.H. Chicago, Chicago university press, 654 p. [in Eng].
Schludi M. (2005) The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Systems. A Comparison of Pension Politics in Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 311 p. [in Eng].
Steber M. (2023) The Guardians of Concepts. Political Languages of Conservatism in Britain and West Germany, 1945-1980. NewYork, Berghahn Books, 553 p. [in Eng].
Stolleis M. (2013) History of Social Law in Germany. Berlin, Springer, 264 p. [in Eng].
Suvanto P. (1997) Conservatism from the French Revolution to the 1990s. / Transl. from Finnish by R. Fletcher. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 224 p. [in Eng].
Woods R. (2007) Germany’s New Right as Culture and Politics. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 193 p. [in Eng].