THE PROBLEM OF THE HISTORICAL PROCESS DRIVING FORCES AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2024-1-61-72Keywords:
теория, problems of philosophy of history, the problem of driving forces in history, theoryAbstract
Introduction. The work one of the main problems of the philosophy of history — the problem of the driving forces of the historical process. The author identifies specific driving forces of history, put forward in historiosophy. The methodological aspects of the formation of the philosophy of history as a whole, determined by the problem of the driving forces of history, are shown. The purpose of the article is to show driving forces issue in forming the problem field of historiosophy. Methods. The author uses the following general scientific methods: modeling, structural-functional, systemic and comparative analysis; movement from abstract to concrete and from concrete to abstract. Scientific novelty of the research. The author identifies problems existing in the philosophy of history and gives an analysis of these problems. The author shows that the one of the most important problem that integrates other historiosophical issues is the problem of the driving forces of history. The specific driving forces of history are identified and analyzed in historiosophy. It is shown that, methodologically, the problem of driving forces in history plays a special role in the philosophy of history in a number of aspects: conceptual, integrative, test, and the aspect of complementarity. Results. The author shows that the problem of driving forces in history solves a number of problems in historiosophy. Firstly, each specific driving force makes it possible to create new theories in the philosophy of history. Secondly, it forms a special picture of historical dynamics. Thirdly, it allows us to consider various factors of history as the main ones in a system of other parameters, thereby finding their true place in analyzing the historical process. Fourth, it demonstrates the need to jointly analyze various driving forces to create a common historical picture. Conclusions. The work examines only a few specific driving forces of history, but they must continue to be identified. The author has identified four aspects that reveal the special methodological role of the driving forces problem of history in historiosophy. In fact, more of them can be identified.Downloads
References
Боден, Ж. Метод легкого познания истории / Ж. Боден. — М. : Наука,
2000. — 411 с.
Болингброк, Г. Письма об изучении и пользе истории / Г. Болингброк. — М. : Наука, 1978. — 359 с.
Боэций. «Утешение философией» и другие трактаты/ Боэций. — М. : Наука, 1990. — 414 с.
Вернадский, В. И. Научная мысль как планетное явление / В. И. Вернадский. — М. : Наука, 1991. — 271 с.
Гречко, П. К. Концептуальные модели истории / П. К. Гречко. — М. : Логос, 1995. — 144 с.
Диалектический и исторический
материализм. Под ред. С. М. Ковалева. — М. : Политиздат, 1968. — 392 с.
Канетти, Э. Масса и власть / Э. Канетти. — М. : АСТ, 2022. — 704 с.
Комнина, А. Алексиада / А. Комнина. — СПб. : Алетейя, 1996. — 704 с.
Лакатос, И. Фальсификация и методология научно-исследовательских программ / И. Лакатос. — М. : Медиум,
1995. — 236 с.
Лев Диакон. История / Л. Диакон. — М. : Наука, 1988. — 240 с.
Локк, Дж. Сочинения. Т. 3 / Дж. Локк. — М. : Мысль, 1988. — 620 с.
Мабли, Г. Об изучении истории. О том, как писать историю / Г. Мабли. — М. : Наука, 1993. — 414 с.
Мейер, Э. Теоретические и методологические вопросы истории. Философско-исторические исследования / Э. Мейер. — М. : Изд-во Сытина, 1904. — 67 с.
Нехамкин, В. А. Модели роли личности в истории: достижения и
пределы / В. А. Нехамкин // Социум и власть. — 2018. — № 2 (70). — С. 24—33. — EDN XRCGPR.
Нехамкин, В. А. Парадигмы контрфактического моделирования
прошлого в социальном познании: итоги, перспективы развития / В. А. Нехамкин // Социум и власть. — 2019. — № 5(79). — С. 7—18. — DOI 10.22394/1996-0522-2019-5-07-18. — EDN YMWLZR.
Новая технократическая волна на Западе. — М. : Прогресс, 1986. — 450 с.
Поппер, К. Открытое общество и его враги. Т.1. Чары Платона / К. Поппер. — М. : Феникс, 1992. — 448 с.
Раппопорт, Х. Философия истории в ее главнейших течениях / Х.
Раппопорт. — СПб. : Тип. Ю. Н. Эрлих, 1898. — 180 с.
Семенов, Ю. И. Философия истории от истоков до наших дней.
Основные проблемы и концепции / Ю.И. Семенов. — М. : Старый сад,
1999. — 380 с.
Тоффлер, Э. Футурошок / Э. Тоффлер. — СПб : Лань, 2007. — 464 с.
Философия истории. Антология. — М. : Аспект-Пресс, 1994. — 351 с.
Фукидид. История / Фукидид. — М. : Ладомир, 1993. — 543 с.
Boden Zh. (2000) Metod legkogo poznaniya istorii [The method of easy
knowledge of history]. Moscow, Nauka, 411 p. [in Rus].
Bolingbrok G. (1978) Pis’ma ob izuchenii i pol’ze istorii [Letters of the
study and use of history]. Moscow, Nauka, 359 p. [in Rus].
Boecij (1990) «Uteshenie filosofiej» i drugie traktaty [Consolation by Philosophy and other treatises]. Moscow, Nauka, 414 p. [in Rus].
Vernadskij V.I. (1991) Nauchnaya mysl’ kak planetnoe yavlenie [Scientific
thought as a planetary phenomenon]. Moscow, Izd-vo «Nauka», 271 p. [in Rus].
Grechko P.K. (1995) Konceptual’nye modeli istorii [Conceptual models of history]. Moscow, Logos, 144 p. [in Rus].
Dialekticheskij i istoricheskij materialism [Dialectical and historical materialism] (1968). Moscow, Politizdat, 392 p. [in Rus].
Kanetti E. (2022) Massa i vlast’ [Mass and power]. Moscow, AST, 704 p. [in Rus]
Komnina A. (1996) Aleksiada [Alexiada].St. Petersburg, Aletejya, 704 p.
[in Rus].
Lakatos, I. (1995) Fal’sifikaciya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel’skih program [Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes].Moscow, Medium, 236 p. [in Rus].
Lev Diakon. Istoriya [The history]. Moscow, Nauka, 240 p. [in Rus].
Lokk Dzh. (1988) Sochineniya [Essays. Volume 3]. Moscow, Mysl’, 620 p. [in Rus].
Mabli G. (1993) Ob izuchenii istorii. O tom, kak pisat’ istoriyu [About the study of history. About how to write a story]. Moscow, Nauka, 414 p. [in Rus].
Mejer E. (1904) Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie voprosy istorii. Filosofsko-istoricheskie issledovaniya [Theoretical and methodological issues of history. Philosophical and historical research]. Moscow, Izd-vo Sytina, 67 p. [in Rus].
Nekhamkin V.A. (2018) Modeli roli lichnosti v istorii: dostizheniya i predely [Models of the role of personality in history: achievements and limits]. Sotsium i vlast/Society and Power, no. 2 (70), pp. 24−33 [in Rus].
Nekhamkin V.A. (2019) Paradigmy kontrfakticheskogo modelirovaniya proshlogo v social’nom poznanii: itogi, perspektivy razvitiya [Paradigms of counterfactual modelling of the past in social cognition: results and development prospects]. Sotsium i vlast/Society and Power, no. № 5 (79),
pp. 7−18. DOI 10.22394/1996-0522-2019-5-07-18 [in Rus].
Novaya tekhnokraticheskaya volna na Zapade [The new technocratic wave in the West] (1986). Moscow, Progress, 450 p. [in Rus].
Popper K. (1992) Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. T.1. Chary Platona
[The Open society and its enemies. Volume 1. The Spell of Plato]. Moscow, Izd-vo Feniks, 448 p. [in Rus].
Rappoport H. (1898) Filosofiya istorii v ee glavnejshih techeniyah [The philosophy of history in its main directions]. St. Petersburg, Tipografiya Yu.N. Erlih, 180 p. [in Rus].
Semenov Yu. I. (1999) Filosofiya istorii ot istokov do nashih dnej. Osnovnye problemy i koncepcii [Philosophy of history from its origins to the present day. Main problems and concepts]. Moscow, Staryj sad, 380 p. [in Rus].
Toffler E. (2007) Futuroshok [Future Shock]. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 464 p.
[in Rus].
Filosofiya istorii. Antologiya [Philosophy of history. Anthology] (1994). Moscow, Aspekt-Press, 351 p. [in Rus].
Fukidid (1993) Istoriya [The history]. Moscow, Ladomir, 543 p. [in Rus].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
