«ВЕЛИКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА» НИЦШЕ И ЭСТЕТИЗАЦИЯ ВЛАСТИ: АНАЛИЗ ЭСТЕТИКО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ДИАЛЕКТИКИ В «ТАК ГОВОРИЛ ЗАРАТУСТРА»

Томас Штайнбух

Authors

Thomas Steinbuch Zhejiang University of Science and Technology (ZUST), Advisor to the Dean of Office of School of Languages and Literature of Research Affairs, Автор https://orcid.org/000-0001-8779-4111 (unauthenticated)

Keywords:

воля к власти, aesthetics, political philosophy, conflictology, hermeneutics, Nietzscheanism, will to power

Abstract

Nietzsche’s later aesthetics is not simply an expression of “art for art’s sake,” but is embedded within a political vision he calls the “Great Politics,” which fundamentally opposes liberal democracy. This paper challenges dominant Western readings that ascribe liberal democratic commitments to Nietzsche, demonstrating instead that his philosophy envisions a great, kinetic war waged against “those who have not turned out well,” a phrase Nietzsche uses broadly for those he deemed unfit. This war is a brutal conflict that rejects the democratic ideal of universal inclusion, even in the variant where agonistic struggle is necessary to improve all participants. The Dionysian age of art, ushered in by this conflict, is waged by individuals who embrace the creative sacrifice demanded by the will to power, confronting nihilism by recognizing it as rooted in the moralizing falsehood that suffering is “punishment” (a “Lügenwort”) and that guilt is irredeemable. Nietzsche identifies this as a lie about humanity’s capacity for evolutionary speciation. His concept of tragic pathos begins as an aesthetic experience — an artistic affirmation of suffering — but is transmuted philosophically into the pathos of eternal recurrence, transforming aesthetic affect into knowledge opposing the spiritualization of revenge and leading humanity into the “World of Truth.” The internalization of this knowledge is not a universal capability — those designated “unfit” are those excluded from it. The work of art emblemizes this new “World of Truth” and symbolizes humanity’s evolutionary potential. The political implications of this transfiguration challenge liberal democracy’s premises in any variation. This interpretation resonates with contemporary political currents that embrace conflict as essential for cultural and political renewal. By unifying Nietzsche’s aesthetics, politics, and philosophy, this reinterpretation offers a significant contribution to Nietzsche studies and the political theory of aesthetics.

Received: 22 February 2025 · Accepted: 8 September 2025

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babich, B. (2016). Towards Nietzsche’s ‘Critical’ Theory - Science, Art, Life and Creative Economics. In Nietzsche als Kritiiker un Denker der Transformation, edited by H. Heir & S. Thorgeirsdottit, 112-133. Berlin. Walter De Gryuter.

Briadotti, R. (2019). Affirmation and Critical Posthuman Theory // Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 36, no. 6: 17-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419848064.

Braidotti, R. (2010). The politics of ‘life itself’ and new ways of dying. In New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics, edited by D. Coole & S. Frost, 201-220. Duke University Press.

Brusotti, M., Siemens, H., Constâncio, J., Bailey, T., Branco, M.J.M., Hay, K. (2017). Nietzsche's Engagements with Kant and the Kantian Legacy, Bloomsbury Academic, vol. 3, Nietzsche and Kant on Aesthetics and Anthropology.

Brobjer, T. (2023). The Revaluation of All Values. Cambridge University Press.

Cantrell, B. (2023). Svätopluk Štúr’s criticism of Nietzsche’s vitalism // Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), vol. 13, no. 1-2, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2023-0005.

Drochon, H. (2016). Nietzsche’s great politics. Princeton University Press.

Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap Press.

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Judgement, translation by P. Guyer & E. Mathews. Cambridge University Press.

Kaplama, E. (2013). Cosmological Aesthetics through the Kantian Sublime and Nietzschean Dionysian. University Press of America.

Kaplama, E. (2016). Kantian and Nietzschean Aesthetics of Human Nature: A Comparison between the Beautiful/Sublime and Apollonian/Dionysian Dualities // Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 1, available at http://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/519.

Lampert, L. (1986). Nietzsche's Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Yale University Press.

Landgraf, E. (2023). Nietzsche's Posthumanism. University of Minnesota Press.

Lazerowitz, M. (1955). The Structure of Metaphysics. Routledge.

Loeb, P.S., Tinsley, D.F. (2019). Afterword. In Nietzsche, F., Unpublished Fragments from the Period of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Summer 1882–Winter 1883/84), edited by P.S. Loeb & D.F. Tinsley, vol. 14, 717-797. Stanford University Press.

Loeb, P.S., Tinsley, D.F. (2022). Afterword. In Nietzsche, F., Unpublished Fragments from the Period of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Spring 1884–Winter 1884/85), edited by P.S. Loeb & D.F. Tinsley, vol. 15, 475-532. Stanford University Press.

Nietzsche, F.W. (1980). Friedrich Nietzsche: Sämtliche Werke Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, edited by G. Colli & M. Montinari. In Nietzsche·Werke: Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, on CD ROM, digitally edited by M. Brown, Walter de Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F.W. (1986). Friedrich Nietzsche: Sämtliche Werke Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, edited by G. Colli & M. Montinari. In Nietzsche·Werke: Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, on CD ROM, digitally edited by M. Brown, Walter de Gruyter.

Nietzsche, F.W. (1968). The Will to Power, translation by W. Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale. Vintage Books.

Nietzsche, F.W. (1976). Thus Spoke Zarathustra, translation by W. Kaufmann. In The Portable Nietzsche. Penguin Books.

Nietzsche, F.W. (2001). Ecce Homo: How One Becomes What One Is. In The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (CWFN), vol. 9. Stanford University Press.

Nietzsche, F.W. (2001). The Antichrist. In The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (CWFN), vol. 9. Stanford University Press.

Nietzsche, F.W. (2001). Twilight of the Idols. In The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (CWFN), vol. 9. Stanford University Press.

Nietzsche, F.W. (2014). Beyond Good and Evil. In The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (CWFN), vol. 8. Stanford University Press.

Nietzsche, F.W. (2023). Unpublished fragments from the period of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In The complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche (CWFN), vol. 15. Stanford University Press.

Nietzsche. F.W. (2025). Unpublished fragments, (Summer 1886-Fall 1887). In The complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche (CWFN), vol. 17. Stanford University Press.

Steinbuch, T. (2022). Revisiting the Question of Eugenics: The Politics of Isolation in Nietzsche’s ‘Ecce Homo’ // The Agonist, vol. 16, no. 2, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.5840/agonist202216211.

Steinbuch, T. (2023). Review of the book ‘Nietzsche's Ecce Homo and the revaluation of all values: Dionysian versus Christian values’, by T.H. Brobjer // The Agonist, vol. 17, no 1, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.33182/agonist.v17i1.3001.

Strong, T.B. (1988). Nietzsche's Political Aesthetics. In Nietzsche's New Seas: Explorations in Philosophy, Aesthetics, and Politics, edited by M.A. Gillespie & T.B. Strong, 153-174. University of Chicago Press.

Strong, T.B. (1999). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration. University of Illinois Press.

Štúr, S. (1967). The German Will to Power. Obzor Press.

Wisdom, J.O. (1953). The unconscious origin of Berkeley's philosophy. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Babich, B. (2016). Towards Nietzsche’s ‘Critical’ Theory — Science, Art,

Life and Creative Economics. In Nietzsche als Kritiiker un Denker der Transformation, edited by H. Heir & S. Thorgeirsdottit, 112-133. Berlin. Walter De Gryuter.

Briadotti, R. (2019). Affirmation and Critical Posthuman Theory // Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 36, no. 6: 17-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419848064.

Braidotti, R. (2010). The politics of ‘life itself’ and new ways of dying. In New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics, edited by D. Coole & S. Frost, 201-220. Duke University Press.

Brusotti, M., Siemens, H., Constâncio, J., Bailey, T., Branco, M.J.M., Hay, K.

(2017). Nietzsche’s Engagements with Kant and the Kantian Legacy, Bloomsbury Academic, vol. 3, Nietzsche and Kant on Aesthetics and Anthropology.

Brobjer, T. (2023). The Revaluation of All Values. Cambridge University Press.

Cantrell, B. (2023). Svätopluk Štúr’s criticism of Nietzsche’s vitalism // Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), vol. 13, no. 1-2, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2023-0005.

Drochon, H. (2016). Nietzsche’s great politics. Princeton University Press.

Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap Press.

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of Judgement, translation by P. Guyer & E.

Mathews. Cambridge University Press.

Kaplama, E. (2013). Cosmological Aesthetics through the Kantian Sublime and Nietzschean Dionysian. University Press of America.

Kaplama, E. (2016). Kantian and Nietzschean Aesthetics of Human Nature: A Comparison between the Beautiful/Sublime and Apollonian/Dionysian Dualities // Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 1, available at http://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/519.

Lampert, L. (1986). Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Yale University Press.

Landgraf, E. (2023). Nietzsche’s Posthumanism. University of Minnesota

Press.

Lazerowitz, M. (1955). The Structure of Metaphysics. Routledge.

Loeb, P.S., Tinsley, D.F. (2019). Afterword. In Nietzsche, F., Unpublished

Fragments from the Period of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Summer 1882–Winter 1883/84), edited by P.S. Loeb & D.F. Tinsley, vol. 14, 717-797. Stanford University Press.

Loeb, P.S., Tinsley, D.F. (2022). Afterword. In Nietzsche, F., Unpublished

Fragments from the Period of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Spring 1884–Winter 1884/85), edited by P.S. Loeb & D.F. Tinsley, vol. 15, 475-532. Stanford University Press.