Self-prohibition in the context of subjectification: man, technology, and the malevolent genius
Keywords:
данные, ethics, self-prohibition, cyberfraud, subject, human, technology, dataAbstract
The article analyzes the self-prohibition mechanism for loans and credits, introduced in Russia in 2025, as an element of subjectification. The introduction outlines a recent shift in the history of the concept of the subject, associated with the shift of its problematic to an interdisciplinary field at the intersection of philosophy, social science, and the history of science. The author briefly characterizes the approach used here to study the subject. It is understood as a historical formation realized by individuals in practices and knowledge. The researchers focus on subjectification as the formation of the subject and various models of the subject, reconstructed using empirical material. The author proceeds from the assumption that self-prohibition can function as an element of such subjectification. The main section provides a brief description of the self-prohibition mechanism, introduced as a means of combating cyberfraud, and cites the reasons for this situation, primarily the high level of digitalization of financial processes and the availability of databases. In a first approximation, self-prohibition is intended to create subjects who are responsible for their well-being and make conscious decisions. This mechanism is then compared with the epistemic virtue of mechanical objectivity. It is shown that in both cases, there is a mistrust of the subject, a renunciation of will, and recourse to technology to resolve an ethical problem. However, in the case of self-prohibition, there is no self-improvement, and doubt is directed both inward, at the subject's ability to recognize the threat of cyberfraud, and outward, at the media and the situation as a whole. This doubt is conceptualized using media-ontological suspicion (B. Groys), the figure of the malevolent genius (Descartes), and the precautionary principle (F. Ewald). Self-prohibition is shown to function as an ethical tool of self-help and self-regulation, allowing one to regain control over one's life. Moreover, the subject should be understood in terms of distribution or network, since with the adoption of self-prohibition, it, as a technical and managerial structure, becomes a functional part of the subject.Downloads
References
Алымов, С. С. Активизация «Человеческого фактора»: «Застойные» корни неолиберальной субъективности? / С. С. Алымов // Антропологический форум. — 2018. — № 37. — С. 53–92. — DOI: 10.31250/1815-8870-2018-14-37-54–92. EDN: XQVTJZ.
Афанасов, Н. Ускоренная рефлексивность — депрессивная социальность / Н. Афанасов // Логос. — 2023. — Т. 33. — № 6. — С. 1–27. — DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2023-6-1–25. — EDN: RVUTFI.
Бейтсон, Г. Кибернетика «Я»: теория алкоголизма / Г. Бейтсон // Он же. Экология разума. Избр. статьи по антропологии, психиатрии и эпистемологии. — Москва: Смысл, 2000. — ISBN: 5-93409-005–7.
Видаль, Ф. Церебральность и антропологический тип современности / Ф. Видаль // Социология власти. — 2020. — № 2. — С. 208–247. — DOI: 10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-208–247. — EDN: FMBVUI.
Волков, В. В. Теория практик / В. В. Волков, О. В. Хархордин. — СПб.: Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2008. — ISBN: 978-5-94380-078–8. EDN: YWCDGG.
Гройс, Б. Под подозрением. Феноменология медиа / Б. Гройс. — М.: Художественный журнал, 2006. — ISBN: 5901116143.
Дардо, П. Неолиберализм и капиталистическая субъективация / П. Дардо, К. Лаваль // Логос. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 103–117. — EDN: RKKUAO.
Дастон, Л., Объективность / Л. Дастон, П. Галисон. — М. : Новое литературное обозрение, 2018. — ISBN: 978-5-4448-0932-7. — EDN: PIXKTY.
Декарт, Р. Размышления о первой философии / Р. Декарт // Сочинения : в 2 томах. Т. 2. — М. : Мысль, 1994.
Деррида, Ж. Кто приходит после субъекта / Ж. Деррида, Ж.-Л. Нанси // Художественный журнал. — 2020. — № 115. — С. 12–33.
Дмитриев, Т.А. Проблема методического сомнения в философии Рене Декарта / Т.А. Дмитриев. — М.: ИФ РАН, 2007. — ISBN: 978-5-9540-0064-1. — EDN: RYRYBL.
Дуденкова, И. Пустое место: теоретические эмуляции субъекта / И. Дуденкова // Логос. — 2021. — № 3. — С. 39–48. — DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2021-3-39–47. — EDN: GAXGRH.
Иванов, Д. В. Экстернализм и теория расширенного сознания / Д. В. Иванов // Философия науки и техники. — 2019. — Т. 24. — № 2. — С. 33–42. — DOI: 10.21146/2413-9084-2019-24-2-33–42. — EDN: BLWNUG.
Латур, Б. Почему критика выдохлась? От фактов к вопросам, вызывающим озабоченность / Б. Латур // Логос. — 2023. — № 5. — С. 29–64. — DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2023-5-29–61. — EDN: GEYIRG.
Ло, Д. Технология и гетерогенная инженерия: случай португальской экспансии / Д. Ло // Логос. — 2018. — № 5. — С. 169–202. — DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2018-5-169–199. — EDN: YLMZFJ.
Павлов А. Критика концепции надзорного капитализма / А. Павлов // Логос. — 2025. — Т. 35. — № 4. — С. 197–228. — DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2025-4-197–225. — EDN: BAEDKT.
Симонова, О. Эмоциональная разметка психотерапевтической культуры: императив, идейные противоречия, линии анализа / О. Симонова // Журнал исследований социальной политики. — 2024. — Том 22. — № 1. — С. 7–24. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-1-7–24. — EDN: LREYWI.
Фуко, М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук / М. Фуко — СПб.: A-cad, 1994 — ISBN 5-85962-021–7.
Фуко, М. О генеалогии этики: обзор текущей работы / М. Фуко // Логос. — 2008. — № 2. — С. 143–144. — EDN: TJLKDR.
Фуко, М. Технологии себя / М. Фуко // Логос. — 2008. — № 2. — С. 96–122. — EDN: TJLKCX.
Amouroux, R. Historicizing “therapeutic culture”. Towards a material and polycentric history of psychologization / R. Amouroux, L. Gerber, C. Jaccard, M. Aronov // Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. — 2023. — No 59 (3). — P. 237–245. — DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.22273. — EDN: ELEFLM.
Coopman, C. How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person / C. Coopman — University of Chicago Press, 2019. — ISBN: 9780226626611.
Coopman, C. Human-Data Coupling: Informational Personhood & Artificial Intelligence Through Gilbert Simondon’s Philosophy of Technology / C. Coopman // Social Epistemology. — 2025. — Vol. 39. — P. 1–12. — DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2025.2466162.
Ewald, F. The Return of Descartes’s Malicious Demon: An Outline of a Philosophy of Precaution / F. Ewald // Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility / Baker T., Simon J. (eds.). — Chicago. IL: Chicago University Press, 2001. — P. 273–301.
Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild / E. Hutchins. — Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995. — ISBN: 9780262581462.
Nandy, A. The twentieth century: the ambivalent homecoming of homo psychologicus / A. Nandy // Hitotsubashi journal of social studies. — 2001. — Vol. 33. — №. 1. — P. 21–33.
Rose, N. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind / N. Rose, J.M. Abi-Rached. — Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. — ISBN: 9781400846337.
Vidal, F. Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject / F. Vidal, F. Ortega. — New York: Fordham University Press, 2017. — ISBN: 978-0-8232-7607-3.
Who comes after the subject? / E. Cadava, P. Connor, J.-L. Nancy (eds.). — New York: Routledge, 1991. — ISBN: 9780415903608.
Alymov, S.S. (2018) “Activating the Human Factor”: The Late-Soviet Roots of Neoliberal Subjectivity? Forum for Anthropology and Culture, no. 37, p. 53–92. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2018-14-37-54–92. https://elibrary.ru/xqvtjz.
Afanasov, N. (2023) Accelerated reflexivity — depressed sociality. Logos, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2023-6-1–25. https://elibrary.ru/rvutfi.
Bateson G. (2000) The cybernetics of “self”: A theory of alcoholism. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Moscow, Smysl. ISBN: 5-93409-005–7.
Vidal, F. (2020) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. Sociology of Power, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 208–247. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-208–247. https://elibrary.ru/fmbvui.
Volkov, V.V., Kharkhordin, O.V. (2008) Theory of practice. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg, 297 p. ISBN: 978-5-94380-078–8. https://elibrary.ru/ywcdgg.
Groys, B. (2006) Under Suspicion: A Phenomenology of Media. Moscow, Art Magazine. ISBN: 5901116143.
Dardo, P., Laval, C. (2011) Neoliberalism and capitalist subjectivation. Logos, no. 1, p. 103–117. https://elibrary.ru/rkkuao.
Daston, L., Galison P. (2018) Objectivity. Moscow, New Literary Observation. ISBN: 978-5-4448-0932-7. https://elibrary.ru/pixkty.
Descartes, R. (1994) Meditations on first philosophy. Works in 2 volumes, vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl.
Derrida, J., Nancy, J.-L. (2021) Who comes after the subject. Moscow Art Magazine, no. 115. p. 12–33.
Dmitriev, T.A. (2007) The problem of methodical doubt in the philosophy of Rene Descartes. Moscow: IF RAN ISBN: 978-5-9540-0064-1. https://elibrary.ru/ryrybl.
Dudenkova, I. (2021) An unoccupied place: theoretical emulations of the subject. Logos, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2021-3-39–47. https://elibrary.ru/gaxgrh.
Ivanov, D.V. (2019) Externalism and the theory of extended mind. Philosophy of Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 33–42. https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2019-24-2-33–42. https://elibrary.ru/blwnug.
Latour, B. (2023) Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Logos, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 29–64. https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2023-5-29–61. https://elibrary.ru/geyirg.
Law, J. (2018) Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion. Logos, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 169–202. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2018-5-169–199. https://elibrary.ru/ylmzfj.
Pavlov A. (2025) Critique of Surveillance Capitalism. Logos, vol. 35, no 4, pp. 197–228. https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2025-4-197–225. https://elibrary.ru/baedkt.
Simonova, О. (2024) The emotional markup of psychotherapeutic culture: imperatives, ideational contradictions, and lines of analysis. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, vol. 22. no 1. p. 7–24. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2024-22-1-7–24. https://elibrary.ru/lreywi.
Foucault, M. (1994) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Saint-Petersburg, A-cad. ISBN 5-85962-021–7.
Foucault, M. (2008) On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress. Logos, no. 2, p. 143–144. https://elibrary.ru/tjlkdr.
Foucault, M. (2008) Technologies of the Self. Logos, no. 2, p. 96–122. https://elibrary.ru/tjlkcx.
Amouroux, R., Gerber, L., Jaccard, C., Aronov, M. (2023) Historicizing “therapeutic culture”. Towards a material and polycentric history of psychologization / R. Amouroux, L. Gerber, C. Jaccard, M. Aronov // Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, vol. 59, no. 3, p. 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22273. https://elibrary.ru/eleflm.
Coopman, C. (2019) How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226626611.
Coopman, C. (2025) Human-Data Coupling: Informational Personhood & Artificial Intelligence Through Gilbert Simondon’s Philosophy of Technology. Social Epistemology, vol. 39, p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2466162.
Ewald, F. (2001) The Return of Descartes’s Malicious Demon: An Outline of a Philosophy of Precaution. Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility / Baker T., Simon J. (eds.). Chicago. IL: Chicago University Press, p. 273–301.
Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262581462.
Nandy, A. (2001) The twentieth century: the ambivalent homecoming of homo psychologicus. Hitotsubashi journal of social studies, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 21–33.
Rose, N., Abi-Rached, J.M. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9781400846337. https://elibrary.ru/wnqvfr.
Vidal, F., Ortega, F. (2017) Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject. New York: Fordham University Press. ISBN: 978-0-8232-7607-3. https://elibrary.ru/ydqpwx.
Who comes after the subject? / E. Cadava, P. Connor, J.-L. Nancy (eds.). New York: Routledge, 1991. ISBN: 9780415903608.