ARE ABSTRACTION FROM HISTORY AND DIGITALIZATION OF DIALECTIC MATERIALISM VALID

Abstract

The article deals with counterarguments to the ideas of prof. V.O. Lobovikov referring to the nature of dialectic materialism and prospective of its formalization and digitalization. The author questions the validity of ahistoric essence of dialectic materialism. Dialectic materialism is a unique in its substance philosophic creation still unknown for philosophic history. It is the product of social and political development of Eastern Europe in ХIХ century and the dialectic principals were to express social and class interest of proletariat. The possibility to connect unconnected scientific and ideological characters is proved by the fact that proletariat is the only class intended to express universal interests with its economic and political stature. For Marxism founders dialectic materialism is essential methodological and world outlook means for theoretic construction. Methodological and world outlook constituent of dialectic materialism, correspond to transition from classical stage of science to postclassical, saves its significance as the most important discoveries of the newest scientific stage require analysis and construction of scientific worldview.