FORMING THE IDEAL OF “INTEGRAL KNOWLEDGE” IN THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONCEPTS OF A. S. KHOMYAKOV AND I. V. KIREEVSKY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-3-93-102Keywords:
вера, I. V. Kireevsky, “axial time”, Russian metaphysics, epistemology, “whole knowledge”, early Slavophiles, Eastern Christianity, faithAbstract
Introduction. The article analyzes the problem of the influence of the philosophical and theological creativity of the early Slavophiles on Russian metaphysics of the late 19th - mid-20th centuries, considered as an original philosophical direction of Russian thought. The purpose of the study. The authors attempt to substantiate the fact that the relatively small works of A. S. Khomyakov and very few articles of I. V. Kireevsky contain both amazing philosophical insights and the initial development of the main concepts that will determine the specifics of Russian metaphysics in the future. Methods. As a general philosophical methodology, personalistic and hermeneutic approaches were used, the main feature of which is the assertion of the free creative activity of the individual, who, on the basis of his inner impulses, is able to change the surrounding reality, both social and natural. The authors also use general scientific methods — analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization. Scientific novelty of the research. The authors focus their attention on the most important epistemological component for the philosophy of the early Slavophiles and the subsequent Russian philosophy — the ideal of “whole knowledge”. In their opinion, the conceptualization of the problems associated with the criticism of the “self-ruling mind” (I. V. Kireevsky) became a necessary and adequate response to the hypertrophy of the place and role of the human mind in cognitive activity that took place in Western European thought. Results. The article provides arguments in favor of the fact that the prerequisites for forming the ideal of “whole knowledge” among the early Slavophils were the traditional Eastern Christian worldview ideas about the relationship of man to the world created by God, open to creative and transformative activity, in the implementation of which one should strive for unification of cognitive efforts, both faith and reason. In a broad historical and philosophical context, Slavophile thought continued on Russian soil to comprehend the phenomenon that K. Jaspers defined as “axial time”, a feature of which was the breakthrough of human consciousness into the sphere of the transcendent. It was at that time that faith was discovered as a way of knowing the incomprehensible, and the Slavophiles made their significant contribution to its understanding.Downloads
References
Аверинцев, С. С. Поэтика ранневизантийской литературы / С. С. Аверинцев. — М. : Coda, 1997. — 343 с.
Зеньковский, В. В. История русской философии : в 2 т. / В. В. Зеньковский. — Т. 2. — Ростов н/Д. : Феникс, 1999. — 528 с.
Кант, И. Критика чистого разума / И. Кант. — Ростов н/Д. : Феникс, 1999. — 672 с.
Киреевский, И. В. О необходимости и возможности новых начал для философии // И. В. Киреевский. Избранные статьи. — М. : Современник, 1984. — С. 238—272.
Киреевский, И. В. О характере просвещения Европы и о его отношении к просвещению России // И. В. Киреевский. Избранные статьи. — М. : Современник, 1984. — С. 199—237.
Лосев, А. Ф. Русская философия // А. Ф. Лосев. Страсть к диалектике: литературные размышления философа. — М. : Советский писатель, 1990. — С. 78—101.
Маслин, М. А. Зарубежная историография русской философии / М. А. Маслин // OMNIA CONJUNGO : сб. науч. работ в честь 65-летия проф. В. В. Сербиненко. — М. : РГГУ, 2015. — С. 82—91.
Нижников, С. А. Творчество Иммануила Канта в диалоге культур России и Запада : монография / С. А. Нижников. — М. : Политическая энциклопедия, 2015. — 255 с.
Сербиненко, В. В. Русская метафизика XIX — XX веков / В. В. Сербиненко, И. В. Гребешев. — М. : Руниверс, 2016. — 800 с.
Соловьев, В. С. Философские начала цельного знания // В. С. Соловьев. Сочинения : в 2 т. — Т. 2. — М. : Мысль, 1990. — С. 139—288.
Философская система Г. В. Ф. Гегеля: диалектическая логика, тождество бытия и мышления, философия истории. — URL:
https://myfilology.ru//174/filosofskaya-sistemagvfgegelya-dialekticheskaya-logika-tozhdestvobytiya-i-myshleniya-filosofiya-istorii/ (дата обращения: 17.05.2023).
Флоровский, Г. В. Христианство и цивилизация // Г. В. Флоровский. Избранные труды по богословию и философии. — СПб. : РХГА, 2005. — 862 с.
Хомяков, А. С. По поводу брошюры г-на Лоранси // А. С. Хомяков. Сочинения богословские. — СПб. : Наука, 1995. — С. 57—106.
Хомяков, А. С. По поводу послания архиепископа парижского // А. С. Хомяков. Сочинения богословские. — СПб. : Наука, 1995. — С. 107—162.
Хомяков, А. С. Семирамида // А. С. Хомяков. Сочинения : в 2 т. — Т. 1. Работы по историософии. — М. : Медиум, 1994. — С. 15—448.
Хомяков, А. С. Церковь одна // А. С. Хомяков. Сочинения богословские. — СПб. : Наука, 1995. — С. 39—56.
Хоружий, С. С. Театр ситуаций / С. С. Хоружий. — URL: http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=4301#H (дата обращения: 10.01.2023).
Чжан, Б. О трагедии русской религиозной философии / Байчунь Чжан // Вопросы философии. — 2007. — № 5. — С. 73—79.
Эзри, Г. К. Персонализм и проблема межличностной коммуникации (историкофилософский аспект) / Г. К. Эзри // Социум и власть. — 2019. — № 3 (77). — С. 76—85.
Ясперс, К. Смысл и назначение истории / К. Ясперс. — М. : Республика, 1994. — 527 с.
Averincev S. S. (1997) Pojetika rannevizantijskoj literatury [Poetics of Early Byzantine Literature]. Moscow, Coda, 343 p. [in Rus].
Zen’kovskij V. V. (1999) Istorija russkoj filosofii [History of Russian philosophy], vol. 2. Rostov on Don, Feniks, 528 p. [in Rus].
Kant I. (1999) Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of pure reason]. Rostov on Don, Feniks, 672 p. [in Rus].
Kireevskij I. V. (1984) O neobhodimosti i vozmozhnosti novyh nachal dlja filosofii [On the Necessity and Possibility of New Beginnings for Philosophy] // in Izbrannye stat’i. Moscow, Sovremennik, pp. 238—272 [in Rus].
Kireevskij I. V. (1984) O haraktere prosveshhenija Evropy i o ego otnoshenii k prosveshheniju Rossii [On the nature of the enlightenment of Europe and its relation to the enlightenment of Russia] / in Izbrannye stat’i.
Moscow, Sovremennik, pp. 199—237 [in Rus].
Losev A. F. (1990) Russkaja filosofija [Russian philosophy] / in Strast’ k dialektike: Literaturnye razmyshlenija filosofa. Moscow, Sovetskij pisatel’, pp. 78—101 [in Rus].
Maslin M. A. (2015) Zarubezhnaja istoriografija russkoj filosofii [Foreign
historiography of Russian philosophy] / in OMNIA CONJUNGO: Sbornik nauchnyh rabot v chest’ 65-letija prof. V. V. Serbinenko. Moscow, RGGU, pp. 82—91 [in Rus].
Nizhnikov S. A. (2015) Tvorchestvo Immanuila Kanta v dialoge kul’tur Rossii i Zapada: Monografija [Creativity of Immanuel Kant in the dialogue of cultures of Russia and the West: Monograph]. Moscow, Politicheskaja
jenciklopedija, 255 p. [in Rus].
Serbinenko V. V., Grebeshev I. V. (2016) Russkaja metafizika XIX — XX vekov [Russian metaphysics of the 19th—20th centuries]. Moscow, Runivers, 800 p. [in Rus].
Solov’ev V. S. (1990) Filosofskie nachala cel’nogo znanija [Philosophical principles of integral knowledge] //Sochinenija, vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl’, pp. 139—288 [in Rus].
Filosofskaja sistema G.V.F. Gegelja: dialekticheskaja logika, tozhdestvo bytija i myshlenija, filosofija istorii [The philosophical system of G.W.F. Hegel: dialectical logic, identity of being and thinking, philosophy of history], available at: https://myfilology.
ru//174/filosofskaya-sistema-gvfgegelyadialekticheskaya-logika-tozhdestvo-bytiyai-myshleniya-filosofiya-istorii/ (accessed 17.05.2023) [in Rus].
Florovskij G. V. (2005) Hristianstvo i civilizacija. Izbrannye trudy po bogosloviju i filosofii [Christianity and Civilization]. Saint Petersburg, RHGA, 862 p. [in Rus].
Homjakov A. S. (1995) Po povodu broshjury g-na Loransi [Concerning Mr. Laurency’s pamphlet] / in Sochinenija bogoslovskie. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, pp. 57—106 [in Rus].
Homjakov A. S. (1995) Po povodu poslanija arhiepiskopa parizhskogo
[Concerning the Epistle of the Archbishop of Paris] / in Sochinenija bogoslovskie. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, pp. 107—162 [in Rus].
Homjakov A. S. (1994) Semiramida [Semiramide] / in Sochinenija, vol. 1, Raboty po istoriosofii. Moscow, Medium, pp. 15—448 [in Rus].
Homjakov A. S. (1995) Cerkov’ odna [Church alone] / in Sochinenija bogoslovskie. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, pp. 39—56 [in Rus].
Horuzhij S. S. Teatr situacij [Theater of situations]. available at: http://synergia-isa.ru/?page_id=4301#H (accessed 10.01.2023) [in Rus].
Chzhan Bajchun’ (2007) O tragedii russkoj religioznoj filosofii [On the tragedy of Russian religious philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 5, pp. 73-79 [in Rus].
Jezri G. K. (2019) Personalizm i problema mezhlichnostnoj kommunikacii (istoriko-filosofskij aspekt) [Personalism and the problem of interpersonal communication (historical and philosophical aspect)]. Socium i vlast’, no. 3 (77), pp. 76-85 [in Rus].
Jaspers K. (1994) Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow, Respublika, 527 p. [in Rus].