MODERN WARS AND THEIR IMPACT ON NATIONAL SECURITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1996-0522-2023-4-37-50Keywords:
национальная идентичность, asymmetric war, hybrid war, national security, national security factor, state, national identityAbstract
Introduction. War occupies a special place in the mankind development because it is an integral part of its history. Thousands of researchers have been engaged in the problem of war from the standpoint of various sciences. The confrontation of nations and individual social groups as a social and political fact has been seen in philosophical thought since the epoch of the first major civilizations. However, at the present stage of society’s development, the problems of war are closely connected with the national security phenomenon because the state protection from internal and external threats actually prevents the risks of damage to manpower, civilian population, infrastructure, and economy. The purpose of the study is to determine to what degree the leading characteristics of the three main war forms influence the national security transformation at the present stage of society development. Methods. To achieve the study purpose and solve the tasks set, the logical method of analysis for structuring materials, the historical method for correct and chronologically consistent presentation of facts, the comparative method for identifying distinctive parameters in the compared judgments and the deductive method for determining conclusions based on the results of the study are used. Scientific novelty of the research. The study provides a detailed analysis of modern wars and their impact on national security. The author has studied the interrelationships between various forms of military conflicts and their consequences for the stability of the state. Special attention is paid to the methodology of analyzing hybrid and asymmetric wars, which allows a deeper understanding of their characteristics and impact on the national security system. This approach helps to better understand the dynamics of modern threats and strategies to counter them. Results. The author gives the definition of national security through the war phenomenon, determines the features of conventional war that influence the formation of the national security of the state and the requirements for transforming security, analyzes the influence of asymmetric warfare methods on national security, determines the features of hybrid warfare in opposition to the fundamentals of national security, and makes the conclusion on the influence of various war forms on national security transformation and stability. Conclusions. At the present stage of the world community development, various war forms require an individual state to transform methods and mechanisms of national security that would not keep up or catch up with the war technologies but prevent threats based on a stable national identity, the coordinated work of all actors of national security, the construction of mechanisms that serve the stability of social and economic activity.Downloads
References
Дериглазова, Л. В. Парадокс асимметрии в международном конфликте / Л. В. Дериглазова // Международные процессы. — 2005. — № 3 (9). — С. 85—94.
Дериглазова, Л. В. Победы и поражения США и РФ в симметричных
конфликтах XXI века / Л. В. Дериглазова // Международная аналитика. 2022. — № 13 (2). — С. 23—41. DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-2-23-42.
Карпова, Е. А. Эволюция ключевых содержательных аспектов стратегии национальной безопасности России / Е. А. Карпова // Вестник Российской нации. — 2023. — № 1-2 (89). — С. 191—196.
Клаузевиц, К. Принципы ведения войны / К. Клаузевиц. — М. : Центрполиграф, 2009. — 228 с.
Германская военная мысль / К. фон Клаузевиц, Х. Дельбрюк, А. фон
Шлиффен, А. фон Богуславский и др. — М. : Астрель, 2013. — 674 с.
Копичев, О. А. Современные войны: анализ тенденций развития
межгосударственного противоборства, классификация форм и способов борьбы, формирование признаков и критериев военного конфликта / О. А. Копичев, А. Е. Николаев // Системы управления, связи и безопасности. — 2021. — № 1. — С. 1—32. — DOI:
10.24411/2410-9916-2021-10101.
Родачин, В. М. Гибридные войны и обеспечение национальной безопасности России / В. М. Родачин // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. — 2019. — № 4. — С. 93—99. — DOI: 10. 26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-93-99.
Сунь-Цзы. Воинские правила / Сунь-Цзы. — М. : АСТ, 2019. — 223 с.
Тиханычев, О. В. Гибридные войны: новое слово в военном искусстве или хорошо забытое старое? / О. В. Тиханычев // Вопросы безопасности. — 2020. — № 1. — С. 30—43.
Феоктистов, А. В. Эволюция развития законодательства о национальной безопасности в Российской Федерации / А. В. Феоктистов, И. В. Зернов // Наука. Общество. Государство. — 2023. — № 1 (41). — С. 68—76. DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2023-11-1-8.
Черноперов, В. Л. Гибридная война: предпосылки появления, концепции, сущность, цели, инструментарий, правовые вопросы, риски / В. Л. Черноперов, У. И. Сулейманова // Ноосферные исследования. — 2021. — № 3. — С. 33—46.
Allen, M. A. Deadly Triangles: The Implications of Regional Competition
on Interactions in Asymmetric Dyads / M. A. Allen, S. R. Bell, K. Ch. Clay // Foreign Policy Analysis. — 2016. — № 14 (2). — P. 169—190.
Allen, M. A. From Melos to Baghdad: Explaining resistance to militarized challenges from more powerful states / M. A. Allen, B. O. Fordham // International Studies Quarterly. — 2011. — № 4 (55). —
P. 1025—1045.
Hoffman, F. Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars / F. Hoffman. USA : Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007. — 72 p.
Lasswell, Harold D. Power and Society / Harold D. Lasswell. NY, Toronto, London : McGrow-Hill Book Company, 1950. — 295 p.
Luyt, B. Debating reliable sources: writing the history of the Vietnam
War on Wikipedia / B. Luyt // Journal of Documentation. — 2015. — № 71 (3). — P. 440—455.
Maier, Ch. S. Peace and security for the 1990s. Unpublished paper for the MacArthur Fellowship Program, Social Science Research Council, 12 Jun 1990 / Ch. S. Maier // Joseph J. Romm. Defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects. Pew Project on America’s task in a changed world
(Pew Project Series). USA : Council on Foreign Relations, 1993. — 632 p.
Paleri, P. National security: Imperatives and challenges / P. Paleri. — New Delhi : Tata McGraw-Hill, 2008. — 285 p.
Paul, Th. V. Asymmetric conflicts: war initiation by weaker powers / Th. V. Paul. — New York : Cambridge University Press, 1994. — 410 p.
Romm, J. J. Defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects. Pew Project on America’s task in a changed world (Pew Project Series) / J. J. Romm. — USA : Council on Foreign Relations, 1993. — 522 p.
The Arabic Encyclopedia. Volume 7. USA : Gorgias Press, 2018. — 580 p.
Tomes, R. Relearning Counterinsurgency Warfare / R. Tomes // Journal
of the US Army War College. — 2004. — № 34 (1). — P. 16—28.
Wolfers, A. O. Developments in military technology and their impact on
United States strategy and foreign policy / A. O. Wolfers, P. H Nitze, J. E. King. — USA : Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research for U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 1959. — 73 p.
Deriglazova L.V. (2005) Paradoks asimmetrii v mezhdunarodnom konflikte [Paradox of asymmetry in international conflict]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, no. 3 (9), pp. 85-94 [in Rus].
Deriglazova L.V. (2022) Pobedy i porazheniya SShA i RF v asimmetrichnykh konfliktakh XXI veka [Victories and defeats of the USA and the Russian Federation in asymmetric conflicts of the 21st century].
Mezhdunarodnaya analitika, no. 13 (2), pp. 23-41. DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-2-23-42 [in Rus].
Karpova E.A. (2023) Evolyutsiya klyuchevykh soderzhatel’nykh aspektov
strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossii [Evolution of the key substantive aspects of Russia’s national security strategy]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy natsii, no. 1-2 (89), pp. 191-196 [in Rus].
Klauzevits K. (2009) Printsipy vedeniya voyny [Principles of warfare]. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf, 228 p. [in Rus].
Klauzevits Karl fon. (2013) Germanskaya voennaya mysl’ [German military thought]. Moscow, Astrel, 674 p. [in Rus].
Kopichev O.A., Nikolaev A.E. (2021) Sovremennye voyny: analiz tendentsiy razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo protivoborstva [Modern wars: analysis of trends in the development of international confrontation]. Sistemy upravleniya, svyazi i bezopasnost’, no. 1, pp. 1-32. DOI: 10.24411/2410-9916-2021-10101 [in Rus].
Rodachin V.M. (2019). Gibridnye voyny i obespechenie natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossii [Hybrid wars and ensuring Russia’s national security]. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta, no.4, pp. 93-99. DOI: 10. 26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-93-99 [in Rus].
Sun’-Tzy (2019) Voinskie pravila [Military rules]. Moscow, AST, 223 p. [in Rus].
Tikhanovich O.V. (2020) Gibridnye voyny: novoe slovo v voennom iskusstve ili khorosho zabytoe staroe? [Hybrid wars: a new word in military art or a well-forgotten old one?]. Voprosy bezopasnosti, no. 1, pp. 30-43 [in Rus].
Feoktistov A.V., Zernov I.V. (2023). Evolyutsiya razvitiya zakonodatel’stva o natsional’noy bezopasnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Evolution of the development of legislation on national security in the
Russian Federation]. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo, no. 1 (41), pp. 68-76. DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2023-11-1-8 [in Rus].
Chernoperov V.L., Suleymanova U.I. (2021) Gibridnaya voyna: predposylki poiavleniya, kontseptsiya, sushchnost’, tseli, instrumentarii, pravovye voprosy, riski [Hybrid war: prerequisites, concept, essence, goals, tools, legal issues, risks]. Noosfernye issledovaniya, no. 3, pp. 33-46
[in Rus].
Allen M.A., Bell S.R. & Clay K.C. (2016) Deadly Triangles: The Implications of Regional Competition on Interactions in Asymmetric Dyads. Foreign Policy Analysis, no. 14 (2), pp. 169-190 [in Eng].
Allen M.A. & Fordham B.O. (2011) From Melos to Baghdad: Explaining resistance to militarized challenges from more powerful states. International Studies Quarterly, no. 4 (55), pp. 1025-1045 [in Eng].
Hoffman F. (2007) Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. USA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 72 p. [in Eng].
Lasswell H.D. (1950) Power and Society. NY, Toronto, London: McGrow-Hill Book Company, 295 p [in Eng].
Luyt B. (2015) Debating reliable sources: writing the history of the Vietnam War on Wikipedia. Journal of Documentation, no. 71 (3), pp. 440-455 [in Eng].
Maier Ch.S. (1993) Peace and security for the 1990s. In Romm, J.J. Defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects. USA: Council on Foreign Relations, 632 p. [in Eng].
Paleri P. (2008). National security: Imperatives and challenges. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, 285 p. [in Eng].
Paul Th.V. (1994). Asymmetric conflicts: war initiation by weaker powers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 410 p. [in Eng].
Romm J.J. (1993). Defining national security: the nonmilitary aspects. USA: Council on Foreign Relations, 522 p. [in Eng].
The Arabic Encyclopedia. (2018). Volume 7. USA: Gorgias Press, 580 p. [in Eng].
Tomes R. (2004). Relearning Counterinsurgency Warfare. Journal of the US Army War College, no. 34 (1), pp. 16-28 [in Eng].
Wolfers A.O., Nitze, P.H., King, J.E. (1959). Developments in military technology and their impact on United States strategy and foreign policy. USA: Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research for U.S. Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, 73 p. [in Eng].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.